« May 2017 | Main | July 2017 »

June 14, 2017

Democrats Colluding With Shooter?!

The Republicans and the FBI must immediately open an investigation into the shooting at the baseball diamond in Virginia to find out if Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Chuck Schumer (D-NY), or any other Democrat colluded with the shooter in order to win the upcoming baseball game.

It is being reported that the shooter was a staffer for Senator Sanders during the 2016 presidential campaign.

If you're looking for a motive for this dastardly act, I'm told by anonymous, unnamed, unreliable sources that there were illegal wagers being placed and the Democrats stood to lose tens if not hundreds of dollars if the Republicans won the game.

If necessary, an independent counsel should be named. I hear James Comey isn't busy.

Posted by Rick | June 14, 2017 11:25 AM | Political Science

June 8, 2017

James 'Captain Courageous' Comey Really A Weasel

Former FBI director James Comey is more of a fortune teller, by his own account, than investigator.

Comey fired up his crystal ball on more than one occasion in the past year.

While coming to the conclusion that Hillary Clinton showed no 'intent' while committing over 10 felonies involving her private servers including storing top secret information on unsecured servers, the destruction of over 30,000 emails, the cleaning of her hard drives with a program called BleachBit, allowing her assistant to send classified emails to a computer controlled by her assistants husband, destroying government cell phones with hammers, and more.

When Comey claims that President Trump said he hoped Comey could let the investigation of former national security advisor Michael Flynn go, Comey, who said he felt it was an order, was under obligation to immediately report the conversation to his supervisor, Attorney General Jeff Sessions, because, as such, it was an attempt to obstruct justice. Comey said he didn't report it because he felt, I guess because he had consulted his crystal ball once again, that his supervisor, Attorney General Sessions was going to recuse himself and we know that AG Sessions did just that 17 days later. Unfortunately, after the recusal Comey didn't bother to report it to the next in command at the Attorney General's office either. Maybe it wasn't an order, or maybe, just maybe, it wasn't that important.

Comey also said during the hearing that he wrote down his recollections of his meetings with President Trump because he feared the President would lie about the content of their conversations. Did he have some reason to believe that President Trump was that big of a liar or was he consulting his crystal ball again?

Why would the director of the FBI want to work with and for a man he distrusted so much and who he believed had attempted to obstruct justice?

Posted by Rick | June 8, 2017 12:15 PM | Political Science

McCain Is Ready For Retirement

It was obvious that Senator John McCain (R-AZ) was not in control of all his faculties when questioning former FBI director James Comey. The time has come for Senator McCain to retire to his home in Arizona.

Posted by Rick | June 8, 2017 12:11 PM | Political Science

June 4, 2017

Paris Agreement

I am always amazed by the things liberals say without any proof and they continue to say those things over and over. So often, in fact, that people believe them to be true without questioning the validity of such statements..

The other day before President Trump said that we would not stay in the Paris Agreement there were some outrageous claims being made about it.

From Wikipedia: The Paris Agreement "is an agreement within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) dealing with greenhouse gas emissions mitigation, adaptation and finance starting in the year 2020." The agreement, which is non-binding, says that "each country determines its own contribution it should make in order to mitigate global warming. There is no mechanism to force a country to set a specific target by a specific date."

Of course our former President, HRH Obama, in is zeal to show how important it is to show the world how sorry we are for being so successful,l committed the United States to pay twice as much money as any other country on earth towards this farcical agreement and did so without going the United States Senate for ratification of this non-binding, unenforceable agreement. China and India, perhaps the world's two largest polluters, would pay nothing.

The left would have you believe that 70% of all Americans believe that we should be a part of this non-binding, unenforceable agreement at all costs.

Of course, everyone should do what they can to responsibly reduce their individual carbon footprint, but do so without bankrupting themselves, and if a survey were taken a huge percentage of Americans would agree to this.

I seriously doubt that if the question were framed honestly that 70% of all Americans would support the Paris Agreement, which, by the way, isn't worth the paper it's written on. .

Would you be in favor of staying in the Paris Agreement if you would have to pay twice your current power bill beginning immediately and into the unforeseen future without any governmental subsidies no matter your income level?

Well perhaps, if you have some extra money to spend after paying for all the costs of Obamacare I guess you might.

Posted by Rick | June 4, 2017 03:17 AM | Political Science

eXTReMe Tracker